Help My Inflatable Mattress Leaks

Colloquium "mobile city and quality of life"

For Jesus Carlos Soto Morfin and Patricia Karenina Casarín

Before planning a transportation system, we must ask what city do we want?: Enrique Peñalosa

On Tuesday April 22, 2008 held a symposium "Mobile City and quality of life" in the Adalberto Navarro Auditorium University Center for Social Sciences and Humanities at the U of G. The presidium was formed by Enrique Penalosa, former mayor of Bogotá, current advisor in urban and environmental policies, Mario Silva President of Jalisco Ecological Collective, Jose Palacios, president of the Guadalajara 2020; Diego Monraz SITEUR president and member of Étienne Von Bertrab City for All.

"Happiness, for that matter since we got ... and we can not forget how important ingredient, the urban experience that has day to day." Thus began his speech the former mayor Enrique Peñalosa of Bogotá, "today one more citizen" as the same is declared and noted that "Bogotá is not an issue and [that] do not come to talk about it", reflected on urban problems beyond the mere planning specialist . And is that a good city design is not done by the demonstration route, but through the art of looking for that with which one feels better, he says. "If we had a magic wand, what would we do with it? residential areas may mingle with popular areas, widen the sidewalks, we would reduce the height of the buildings ... the magic wand, "said "Is called time. Gothic churches were taken over 300 years to build, we should not resist very long-term plan our cities. "

How is a democratic city? Peñalosa says that this is necessary to speak of equality and that for many if communism failed, the current system becomes the only possible formula. "Capitalism creates inequality and paradoxical to our Western culture that was born the concept of equality," he said. Political rights, the socioeconomic raised in two types:
1) all citizens are equal before the law is, the interest is a priority to particular interest. "It should conclude, for good urban policy, which should be priority in road space (which is public) public transport rather than private."
2) The equality in the quality of life. Described as an example that all children should have equal access to various goods as "green" you're missing, "within 30 years we can not overthrow the city 30 acres for parks, the twentieth century will be remembered as the century of urban disaster, "he explained.
The whole street was old pedestrian while the car is only 80 years old and uses a public space not all share. The land, seen as a single ship, and inspires us to be appropriated out of any place, but Peñalosa refuted "Mexico is not yours, but of private property and in other places you can camp for 3 or 4 days on private property without asking permission. "

"The only real access (common) is the pedestrian public space to be paying much attention [but] before planning a transport system, one must ask what city we want? and before that how we live? Transport organization is not an engineering issue but a vital matter of choice. Before, had scattered to cities its logic when oil was very cheap, but now it is absurd we spend all on fuel, "he exclaimed.

But what is a good city? Peñalosa asked. "First, one that can be with people, shops, housing, work, all together or next-in the street. Second, walking, bicycling is a more efficient way of walking, if a city requires you to buy bread in a car, has a bad design. Third, do not feel inferior. The street is a meeting between rich and poor, through cultural events, public libraries. " The conflict over public space between cars, bicycles and pedestrians should make us reflect on what Therefore we assign each whom? as fast cars produce unpleasant city, the roads we are locked and there is more violated.

cars are quite recent in human life and every human being matters even without car but still doing environmental impact studies, "what about the human impact?" Questioned. "Is the discussion of public space between both frivolous crime and violence? Free time makes a difference in life while the rich can go to your home with great space and security, the poor have to go to a very small house and only public space, which is the minimum of democracy for citizens. The civilized city, can now be recognized for its pedestrian areas, which demonstrate the value of human life as sacred. "

In Bogotá, Peñalosa said that it required a strong media campaign to convince traders that demanded access to the file "almost to the inside of the stores." He described one of the main problems faced is the invasion of pedestrian areas with cars. On the other hand, parking on the surface (unlike the subway or vertical) is another major urban problem that the government has no obligation to resolve because there is no right to parking, "but other pedestrian safety should be a "clear Peñalosa. On the other hand, "transportation is not resolved by building more roads and more and gets worse is not sustainable mobility is not solved with money but with a change in our way of life." In an advanced city, the question is "how to reduce car use" and in a city where development is "how to facilitate the use of the car."

"Some truths are counter-intuitive", for example, when there is a bottleneck and is thought to create other means will solve the problem. This is not because "make more room for cars means that there are more cars and if there are fewer there is less room for them. " Guadalajara need to find a more compact, since the density is an effective strategy for mobility, where the density increase must go hand in hand with the creation of bike and pedestrian routes. This not only enables density less environmental impact (as opposed to the cities "scattered"), but the coexistence of citizens and the establishment of democracy. At the same time, the high density helps to reduce car use because as you increase the difficulty of using it (through transport subsidies motorist, pedestrian areas, few roads to drive), increases the need to use public transport . Enrique Peñalosa

concluded "A good city is one where a child on a tricycle or bicycle can travel and go back and forth safely."

the end Enrique Peñalosa, Mario Silva Jalisco Ecological Collective stressed the importance of public discussion on the use of the car. Penalosa described the proposals as revolutionary and avant-garde, with him (Peñalosa) dared to not be afraid of discussion. On the other hand stressed that almost never talked about the children who are not recognized as citizens or as persons and citizens all must ask ourselves what we want to Guadalajara? "The human being is also an endangered species extinction, the city is its current average ecological niche "and therefore the reality of this niche determines our personal development and needs a city that wants to participate in its construction, with information. Continuing

Étienne Von Bertrab panel Town for All quoted Eduardo Galeano, who described the current status in the city saying "people are banned in the cities." We need a critique of the current model of government, which runs isolated activities without a comprehensive vision. Bogotá's example is that of a concerted government action. In Guadalajara, campaigns such as carpooling (SEMADES) or construction viaducts, are great failures as they do not solve anything, major highways, interventions difficult to erase. Etienne said that in Guadalajara recognize some citizens over others, and in Jalisco there happens to be a great contempt for the public by officials who do not use public property commonly referred to as the population in general (public schools, transportation, etc.) The know and decide on them.
Without dialogue, nothing happens and the public is left in making decisions as to 400.000 million donated by the government, as opposed to people dying of cancer in the intervention and waiting Salto solution and nothing happens for 30. Would have to admire that in Colombia the political will to change was beyond the war situation that exists, opt for an inclusive vision, not unconnected systems, concluded Von Bertrab.

Finally, Diego Monrráz stated that "we must not colombizar GDL" but that "it is better at times" the current situation. He noted that the citizen's attitude change as the environment, for example, light rail to the truck where it collides with the driver. He explained that "we are not against cars but we recognize an imbalance" and should encourage other means of transportation, because our current mobility system is outdated and obsolete and demand change from the public, the government has to make with fair participation.

Sallie Mae Tax Deductible

Climate change: the new religion?

( Article originally published in the newspaper El Pais )
CARMEN PÉREZ-LANZAC


14/02/2008 Climate change has mobilized scientists who study it, to engineers and economists are looking for technological solutions that measure. And start to catch also a spiritual dimension that is becoming, in the opinion of some, the new religion of XXI century. A new ecological spirituality. Messianic language and tools are used almost religious discourse break schemes and permeate public opinion more skeptical of past causes.

In late October last year, Al Gore arrived in Seville to discuss their movement against climate change, the Climate Project. Gore, 59, climbed on stage and played for the umpteenth time the speech enthusiastically been repeating for several years. That day, someone asked: "How are you able to repeat the same thing over and over again?" "Because I am a man with a sense of mission, so I can say the same things without losing strength, the illusion. Because I have a message I believe passionately, "he replied.

In its quest to reach the party, Gore, who is deeply religious, use phrases like" Noah was told to save the species alive today and this remains our obligation. "And before you lecture the disciples ambassadors as part of their movement, 1,700 around the globe, asked for a" spiritual connection. "

" The structure that Al Gore has organized it is almost religious, with disciples spread the good news, as Jesus Christ "reflects the biologist Miguel Delibes de Castro." Scientists usually insist on the need to rationalize the problems, but the truth is that it is vendible el mensaje emocional, sobre todo si implica a fuerzas superiores a nosotros. Ayuda a que la gente se mueva por algo que debe resultar parecido al sentir de la tribu antes ese dios mágico. A mí no me gusta esta forma de funcionar. Al Gore se considera un hombre con una misión, y yo de Mesías tengo más bien poco. Yo aviso de que algo está pasando y es la sociedad quién debe decidir qué hay que hacer. Sin embargo, soy mucho menos eficaz. Al Gore ha vuelto a demostrar que moviliza mucho más algo parecido a la fe que la racionalidad".

El de Al Gore es el ejemplo más visible, pero no el único. Frases como "Hay que salvar el planeta", "Tenemos una misión", "la culpa es del hombre (¿el sinner?) "," Climate change is coming "(is the punishment?) and do not sound so strange." The green message with religious components has permeated much, "says Miguel Ferrer, a biologist and president of the Foundation Migres." The environmental currents fundamentalists have much in common with faith-based schools. Every time you hear more discourse according to which man is the evil that causes destruction and should be expelled from the last paradises. "

However, the connection between ecology and religion is not so strange if we consider the concept neighbor, as Victor points Viñuales, director of the Foundation Ecology and Development: "Almost all religions have in the center the idea of \u200b\u200bothers. And if we expand the concept, who is your next? Today we know that in a global world the consequences of what we do here and now, affecting far away, both in space and in time. If we build a dam in a spectacular setting, our grandchildren and future generations can not enjoy it. Not only that, it will affect other living things that are dying en masse. Seen this way, there is a clear connection between religion and sustainability. "

One of the 200 ambassadors for Al Gore is John Negrillo. They met years ago during a visits the frustrated candidate for president of the United States to the Campus Party, the electronic entertainment event bringing together more than 8,000 young people in Valencia in late July and which is Negrillo organizer. He recalls that even then Gore took every occasion, like a dinner with friends, to rehearse his speech, the same thread makes his documentary An Inconvenient Truth. It was then that Malaga is engaged in the mission of the Nobel Peace Prize. Asked about the connection between his speech and religious feeling, Negrillo reflects: "All religions are rooted in faith, and in that sense it can confuse the message of environmental and climate protection religious one, because as we can not touch, smell, or even see the CO2 and is almost a matter of faith in the scientific community. "

The explanation sounds reasonable. But it can also be simply a matter of language, as Mosterín Jesus says the philosopher: "This language applied to ecology is simply metaphorical. Phrases such as punishment of climate change ... Are words without meaning literally, as when we say that a blonde girl who has golden hair. What is certain is that life is a phenomenon as rare and fascinating to understand that many people think it is a mission to preserve it. But it is not because we ordered an external authority. Einstein said that he did not believe in a god, but he was deeply religious because he was identified with the universe. "

flirting between ecology and spirituality, is not new. 1966 was a key date. That year he published Science and Survival, Barry Commoner, one of the foundational books of the ecological or environmental flows more or less religious inspiration. "The second half of the twentieth century looked at the rise of many religious movements, spiritual and spiritualists, characterized by a mix of elements different, "says the philosopher José Antonio Marina." One of them extended the ecological fervor of recent decades. For me, what matters are the factors that came together in the green spiritualization. Possibly from the hippie movement was born, his back to nature, joined with some Pantheism, then fashion, he turned to the Earth as a living being, with which established a mystical relationship. Be admired to the nature of ancient cultures, the Pacha Mama, respect for American tribes. "

" The Gaia hypothesis of Lovelock, worked, considering the Earth as a living thing must be respected " , says Marina. "theories such as Deep Ecology extolled the value of the plant world, to the point of comparing the clearing of a forest with the murder of Jews in a concentration camp. By the way, joined the ecological interest in ethics, which drew attention to the need to care for nature. And also the influence of Eastern religions, Buddhism as a light, which advocates universal compassion for all beings. Ecological spirituality is a wicker basket made many.

The author most famous of these currents is James Lovelock and his book Gaia, a new vision of life on Earth, which develops the idea that the Earth is a large living organism, an idea that has some religious because it is based on an intuition that goes beyond scientific reason. "When it was published, mid-seventies, there was a strong rejection, but is now widely accepted, "says Jorge Riechmann, professor of moral philosophy and vice president of Scholars for the Environment." It is not unusual to have some exchange between religious thought and green " he continues. "All the great religions share a sense of universal connection with the cosmos, immersion in everything."

But what environmentalists think of this? Most do not see points in common or you like the idea . 'My feeling is that there is no connection between ecology and religion. The approach is radically different and the message is not the majority that we have a mission, " Yayo says Smith, state coordinator for Ecologists in Action.

"It's not a question of religion, but of values," says Juan Lopez de Uralde, executive director of Greenpeace Spain. "I feel part of a social movement, city, trying to introduce into our values \u200b\u200bthings that were not taken into consideration, and respect for the planet, and should form part of the set of values \u200b\u200bin which we operate. And those values \u200b\u200bare both a lay person like a religion. They are not incompatible. There is some misuses of language in all this and in the pejorative sense, when the real truth is that if something pays homage to the society is consumerism and oil. "

The same argument also comes ahead of Smith:" Economic growth itself has become a religion. Western society and in the process of globalization, the purpose has acquired almost religious overtones is the financial gain at the expense of almost everything "
debate
The funny thing is that with few exceptions, the great religions have not given little attention to the ecology. "It is striking, but there is a strong official position," said Miguel Ferrer. "Catholicism For the family seems much more at risk than the planet itself." You may as of now this will change. In an unprecedented move, during the traditional Christmas message, delivered from the central balcony of St. Peter's Basilica in the Vatican, Pope Ratzinger made a discreet allusion to the problem of climate change. He said: "In the world grows ever more the number of migrants, refugees and evacuees is also due to frequent natural disasters, often caused by alarming environmental upheavals."

alarming environmental upheavals. A whole new approach in the usual papal speeches. So is the fact that the Vatican has decided to plant a forest in Hungary to offset or neutralize its CO2 emissions, like many large companies. Both groups, "are motivated by a genuine feeling of respect for the planet or as a form of advertising?

Juan Negrillo insists that, although we can not confuse ecology with religion, one should not ignore the underlying philosophical background behind the changes that we should meet to curb global warming. To support his argument, gives the example Negrillo a story that has a touch of fairy tale: "One day, a scientist from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (comprising more than 2,000 experts) told me a story that I think is very relevant. He said that when the panel began meeting, it is now a 20 years, the group was an elderly Japanese scientist who in one of the meetings intervened and said 'scientists have found that there is an emissions problem, but we can not solve. Since CO2 is produced by machines, we will call the engineers. These, in turn, say that technology exists to solve the problem, but that costs money, so that economists call. Economists say make their calculations and that to achieve this, we must change our current social model based on transport, energy waste ... so they call sociologists. These, in turn, say it is a problem scale of values \u200b\u200bthat they can not solve, so they will go to the philosophers to tell us what values \u200b\u200bwe should put our efforts and interest. "

Many of the items advertised this wise old man have been met. The engineers have years studying alternatives. In 2006, economist Nicholas Stern estimated the impact of global warming on the world economy. That our social model fails, I have made. You may be reaching the turn to philosophical questions, and hence ecology and spirituality seem closer now than ever.

Althea Contraceptive Uk

Sabina's verses.

"There is no worse than nostalgia that longing never happened "...

" The kisses that I lost, not knowing how to say "I need you."

"when she and I are just these verses"

"You know better than I do that to the bone only calan kisses that you gave, the lips of sin ... "

" Before I want as I want a cat along with anyone who looks like you "

" You who were a master in the difficult art not to get wet under a shower "

" In the fatuous New York, gives more shade than the lemons the Statue of Liberty "

"singing, is to shoot against forgetting, living without you is sleeping at the station"

"I can get decent and say: Take my address, when you get sick of love cheap a while ... call me."

where is the song that I did when you were a poet? ended so sad I could never start.

will not close the window on the dawn breaking the glass that now is the beginning of the end.

you prefer war, the winter without you.

He was a shut these are not a sound, regular loser wins so many battles to oblivion. Recover

new names things, call a spade a spade, came to call the wine, the armpit ... armpit, miserable fate. And the killing to call, once a murderer.

"And the sun is a tear in one eye who can not mourn"

to the soles of my shoes will miss.

dreams no longer that little boy who dreamed he was writing, Mary's heart and do not let me.

not me, nor you, nor anyone. Fingers are miserable that give wind my watch.

I do not like to invest in pipe dreams have brought me here your hips, not your heart.

"for saying what I think, without thinking what I say, but gave me a kiss and more a slap "

" the fish do not die for your mouth, this is going crazy with another crazy, but these eyes do not cry for you "

" What about the critic who indignantly accuses me of playing too Russian roulette? Had it not risky to stay safe accuse me hanging on Street Blues, and that does not ... "

" when the end point of the final non-ellipsis is followed by two ... "

" no man is kissing the lips of the sea "

..." I can get corny and say your lips as I know, that the lips that kiss in my dreams ... "

... and galloping blood in my veins and a cloud of sand inside the heart, and this streak of love no appetite ...

In Comala realized that the place where you have been happy you should not try to return.

no longer close the bars, nor do many excesses, are becoming more sad love songs.

¨ is clothed with the wisdom of madness yours and mine
¨
"There were hungry future in the eyes of grown men"

"... the worst of love is when it happens"

"... the good of the years is to heal wounds, bad kissing is addictive.!

"Although follow dying for you, I'll go with the first one I want ..."

"hang from whom you want, but do not die for love ..."

"Change my wrinkles on your acne"

" who might care after death one has their vices "

" why invest in silly soup cans? is like your own coffin varnish "

" Water puts out fire and burning the years "

" The night we lost the fear of fear was so short that lasts still "good reputation

is convenient to drop at the foot of the bed, now have a chance to prove you're a woman and a lady ...

not miss if you get lost scream

that dreams are really lies
this extremely cowardly
not to say no. Be with you this without you so bitter.

will call today morning I was late, this is such a coward not to tell us not to.

the murderer knows more about love than the poet.

"... When the city of neon paint your lips, go up to board my horse .. I may steal your days, your nights no "

" Each week, a summer dies ... "

" More rare was that summer that did not stop snowing ... "

and die with you if you kill, and kill you if you die, because love does not die when killed, it loves to kill never die.

of forgetting what I learned from the moon, what is the sin I had to search. (Like a thief under the skirt of one, whose name I can not remember now) .. Try me

said the poison, love and hate

lovers ... "She asked him to take her to the end of the world, he put his name all the waves. "

.. In matters of love always lose the best ..

.. "In my house there is nothing forbidden, but do not go falling in love with the dawn you'll have to go off, never forgetting that I've known that once you were in my bed .." They said

love, loneliness was sharing a day in, Dorremí forties and believe it.

was so wise to make poetry just had to move his lips ...

if I have ever given more than I have, I have sometimes more than I give

¨ ° under the sun that stabs me alive without country or owner, as the air they give and the soul never endeavor, with the leftovers of my dreams I have left to eat ¨ ... ¨

highways freedom no one dares to drive without chains

¨ ... "With her I discovered that there is eternal love that lasts the space of a short winter"

"Yesterday I wanted to kill the woman of my life, pulled the trigger when he woke up"

"How to escape when there are no islands to sink? ..."

"The hall where you undressed without your clothes"

"Y Though I know it was not the prettiest in the world, I swear I was prettier than anyone else. "

"When he arrived, he settled for ever in my life. There is nothing better than finding love as ... "

" confused with the neon stars "

** All phrases from songs by Joaquin Sabina .**

Basic Labeled Diagram Of A Bicycle

The scientific attitude against anti-science and pseudoscience.

By: Translated by Paul Kurtz1
: MA Paz y Miño

There was a conflict that has prevailed for a long time in the history of culture between science and religion, reason and passion. Theologians have argued incessantly that there are "limits" for scientific research and it can not penetrate "the transcendental realm" poets have rejected deductive logic and experimental method, which hold removed at the experiences of their sensory qualities. The current controversy between the two cultures of science and the humanities is so familiar.

Although the classical tradition, the scientific enterprise has been significant progress in the past three centuries, solving problems that were allegedly beyond the scope of their methodology, and the scientific revolution that began first in the natural sciences, has extended to biological, social and behavioral, with huge benefits for the achievement of universal education will eventually succeed the scientific view and emancipate humanity from superstition. It was thought that progress was correlated with the growth of science.

confidence in science, however, has been badly shaken in recent years. Even the supposedly advanced societies are flooded by the cults of unreason and other forms of foolishness. At the beginning of this century witnessed the rise of religious ideological fanatics such as Nazism and Stalinism.

Currently, Western democratic societies are being swept away by other forms of irrationalism, often unscientific and pseudoscientific markedly in character. There are several manifestations of this new assault on reason.

A good illustration of this trend is the rise of astrology, but only the tip of the iceberg. Because if you do surveys on the current state of beliefs, one finds that many people seem ready to believe in a wide variety of things, even heinous, without sufficient evidence. Even a random list of some of the bizarre cults and gurus illustrate the point: the consciousness of Krishna, the Maharaj Ji, Aikido, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and diverse forms of Transcendental Meditation, the Unification Church, the Process, the Gurjievianos, Zen, Arica, the Sons of God and the I-Ching. From the standpoint of the skeptic humanistic and scientific, these cults are not more irrational than the orthodox religious groups. Why are the preaching of the latest gurus, more foolish than a dead and resurrected god, the visit of the angel Gabriel to Muhammad, Joseph Smith and his Western trip, Mary Baker Eddy and Christian Science, Theosophy, Rosicrucianism , or the canonization of saints called miracles? Traditional religions violate the credulity even more than the newer and exotic imported religions of Asia, but the former have been around longer and are considered part of the established social system. What is apparent is the stubborn resistance of irrational beliefs through history to the present day, despite the scientific revolution.

Take the phenomenon of "new witches," as Marcello Truzzi has called them, and the revival of interest in exorcism. Only a few years ago would have been strange to have found a college student who believed in witches. Even today, the belief in a multitude of witches and demons, even the devil, it has become fashionable in some circles. This is the era of monsters in Frankenstein, Dracula, werewolves became real to impressionable minds. The novel and film The Exorcist encouraged the belief in exorcism, and some people was unable to distinguish truth from fiction. So we are confronted by a plethora of myths blooming, grown by a publishing industry and media who seek profit.

All this is symptomatic of the current rejection of reason and objectivity. While a decade ago there was a general consensus that at least some rules of evidence existed, today the vast existence of objective criteria for judging true statements is seriously questioned. One hears again and again that "a belief is as good as the next" and that there is a kind of "subjective truth" immune from criticism or rational evidence. One still finds proponents of forms of subjectivity among philosophers science, which argues that the historical or psychological factors are quite responsible for the revolutions in scientific thought.

The reaction against the high standards took another form in the 1960 assault on the New Left and the counterculture to the intellect. The current growth of the cults of unreason is perhaps only a consequence of this phenomenon. We said then we needed to break the laxity of the demands of logic and evidence, and "expand our consciousness" through drugs and other methods. Theodore Roszak said such a position widely read books in their construction of the Counter-Culture (In English Making of a Counter-Culture. New York: Doubleday, 1969) and The Unfinished Animal: The border of Aquarius and the Evolution of Consciousness (The Aquarium Frontier and the Evolution of Consciousness. New York: Harper & Row, 1975).

The counter-culture stressed that objectivity was impossible either because of class prejudice, professional, or because we were locked into the categories of our scientific worldview. You do not hear much criticism of Marxism [when it was fashionable] but one hears that the existing scientific vision is confining. And so there is an attempt to escape through new forms of experience, of which cults are just one part: Mantras, meditation, bioenergetics, yoga, organic gardening, photography kirliana, and extrasensory perception.

This exists alongside other provision is obviously to increase today, an aversion to the technological culture itself. Science and technology are often indiscriminately blamed the current global situation. We hear everywhere about the dangers of technology, destroying the natural ecology, pollution, resource depletion, the misuses of power, the threat of nuclear power plants, etc. Many of these interests are legitimate, however, the critical stance is simply not against technology but against science and scientific research. There are those of the fundamentalist right who still vehemently opposed on ethical or religious grounds, to the teaching of the theory of evolution, Comparative courses in social studies, and sex education. In addition, the scientist is often seen by some on the left as a kind of devil-if it deals with human experimentation or modification of behavior, or participate in genetic research or want to test the genetic basis of CI [Ratio intellectual property]. And increasingly there are those who think and see doctors and psychiatrists as high priests or men wicked voodoo.

We are confronted today with a form of moral righteousness and anti-intellectualism, often bordering on hysteria, which prosecutes science as dehumanizing, brutalized, destructive of liberty and human value. This attitude is paradoxical, because it seems to occur more virulently in affluent societies, where they have made the greatest advances in scientific research and technology.

Should we assume that the scientific revolution, starting in the sixteenth century, is continuous Or is oppressed by the forces of unreason? However, the picture I am painting should not be overestimated. Along with the critics of science are its defenders. And vast resources are spent on education, research organizations and scientific publications. The science is still fairly considered by many people.

Certainly the fact that science is critical to our technological civilization is well recognized by some of the critics of science that leads me to another dimension even growth of irrationality: the proliferation of pseudoscience. Those who are not tempted by the occult can always find ships of the gods, UFOs, the Bermuda triangle or lost continents seduction. The new prophets seek to have their speculative theories concealed by the cloak of scientific legitimacy, including von Däniken and those associated with the dienética, Scientology, and recent efforts to develop a "scientific astrology."

growth of pseudoscience can be seen in many other areas. There are, for example, an effort to explore the so-called parapsychological realm. Psychic phenomena, which were carefully studied in the nineteenth century by the Society for Psychical Research in England and parapsychology, which was investigated for years by JB Rhine at Duke University, have become fashionable. Uri Geller has been examined by "scientific experts" and has been found that possesses amazing "psychic powers", but his prowess can be easily duplicated by magicians such as James Randi using traditional magic tricks. Students and teachers also announced a further investigation of clairvoyance, precognition, telepathy, dreams, disembodied experience, reincarnation, communication with spirits of the dead, psychic healing, poltergeists, and auras.

Some enthusiasts claim to have discovered "the cracks in the realm of the transcendental" and new dimensions of reality. The enemy is always the "behaviorist", the "experimental" or "mechanistic" who supposedly close to such research. We are, some argue, in a revolutionary stage in the history of science, which has seen the emergence of new explanatory paradigms. Critics insist that our usual scientific categories and methods are too narrow and limiting.

I am not denying the continuing need to examine the evidence and keep an open mind. Certainly insist that scientists want to investigate the claims of new phenomena. Science can not be judgmental and intolerant, nor depart from the new discoveries to make judgments that precede the investigation. Extreme forms of scientism can be as dogmatic as the subjectivism. However, there is a difference between the careful use of research methods on the one hand, and the tendency to hasty generalizations based on insufficient evidence on the other. Unfortunately, there are also too often a tendency for the gullible to trust the insufficient data and develop vast assumptions, or insist that his speculations have been confirmed conclusively, when they have not been.

serious questions can be raised about the current scene. Is it the higher the level of irrationality or lower the level of irrationality in earlier times, or the level of foolishness has remained fairly constant in the human attitude and only took on different forms? Why irrationality persists even in advanced societies?

No doubt many sociological and cultural assumptions can explain the growth of irrational beliefs. In recent years the media have grown in influence. The image of the scientist is often outlined by journalists, novelists and playwrights, not always by the same scientists and what science is or does evil has sometimes been developed and has been given a bad name. Or again, it is estimated that half of all the world's support for scientific research is for weapons development, and most of the rest is for industrial purposes and pragmatic. Scientific research has also often been controlled by private interests for profit or government for indoctrination and control. The free and creative research scientist often has to rely on the power structure for their financial support, and what happens to the fruits of their work is beyond their work.

These explanations are certainly valid. But there, in my opinion, deep psychological factors at work, and there is much confusion about the meaning of science itself. The persistence of irrationality in modern culture says something about the peculiar nature of the human species. There is a tendency in the human animal to the credulity-that is, a psychological facility to accept unproven beliefs, being credulous in assent. This trend appears to be deeply ingrained in human behavior that few are without some degree. We are tempted to swallow as gospel truth that others offer us. I'm not just talking about stupidity and ignorance but uncritical naivete about certain subjects.

Undoubtedly there are individuals who specialize in deceiving others, providing false gods and service gaps, but there is certainly also true believers who delude themselves that they want to believe in ideas without adequate evidence, and seek to convert others to their misconceptions. What is at work here is not conscious fraud but self-deception. The curious thing is that sometimes if a psychotic repeats itself often enough, while others come to believe and follow Him. Also, if a lie is sufficiently exaggerated, some people are more apt to believe it. Further, the heretic always risk being burned at the stake, especially after the new mythology becomes institutionalized as the official doctrine.

There, I think, yet another trend in human behavior that stimulates the credulity: the fascination with the mystery and drama. Life for many people is pointless and boring. Defeated by anomie and the tyranny of the trivial, may seek to escape this world using drugs and alcohol, dulling or removing their consciences. Nothing is abandoned to its purpose.

Another fun method is to search for hedonistic pleasures and strong emotions. Yet another is the use of imagination. Literary and dramatic arts provide freedom to the creative imagination, as does religion. Is difficult for some people to distinguish truth from falsehood, fiction and reality. The cults of unreason and the paranormal attract and fascinate. Enable anyone to skirt the limits of the unknown. For ordinary people, is the everyday world and the possibility of escape to another. And look for another place, another universe, another reality.

Therefore there is a search that is fundamental to our being: the conquest of the meaning. The human mind has a genuine desire to plumb the depths of the ineffable, to find a deeper meaning and truth, to reach another realm of existence. Life has no meaning for many, especially the poor, the sick, the homeless, and those who have failed or have little hope. Imagination offers salvation to the trials and tribulations found in this life. So believe in reincarnation or personal survival, even if it is proved a comfort to individuals who face tragedy death and the existence of evil. For ideological reasons, the means of salvation is the utopian vision of a perfect society in the future. The soul is weeping for something much further, deeper, more durable and more perfect than our fleeting world of experience.

Accordingly, the persistence of faith can be explained in part by features within our nature: the credulity, the seduction of the mystery, the search for meaning. People will take the slightest shred of evidence and build a mythological system. Perverted logic and leave your senses, all for the Promised Land. Some willingly change their liberty more authoritarian systems, for comfort and safety. The cults of unreason promise comfort, seek to invest the solitary individual, who often feel strange and alone, an important role in the universe.

What science can say about those human needs? Have we abandoned perhaps all fields of science and moved to the philosophy? Science should have a say, because what is at stake is the nature of science itself.

There are many meanings for the word "science." Some who talk about science relate to the specialty in a specific field, such as endocrinology, microbiology or econometrics. Others talk about science have in mind the technological and experimental applications of scientific theories to practical problems. However, these views of science are too narrow, because it is possible for a society to achieve massive progress in certain technological fields narrow, however, miss the point total of the scientific enterprise. Totalitarian societies in our time invested sums of money in rough technical research and achieved a high level of scientific expertise in certain fields, but the scientific view did not prevail in them. Not enough new people training to become scientists. A culture can be fraught with technical, scientific, however, remain dominated by the irrational. We must distinguish science as a technical company close of the scientific attitude. I think here we have not established an important purpose. Unfortunately, to have scientific credentials field does not mean that a person will incorporate a scientific approach to some parts of your life.

The best therapy for the rampant credulity and imagination is the development of scientific attitude, as it applies not only to a specialized field of expertise but also to broader issues of life itself. But we failed in our society to develop and expand the scientific attitude. It is clear that one can be a scientific specialist but a cultural barbarian, a technology expert in a particular field but ignorant beyond.

If we are to meet the growth of irrationality, we need to develop an appreciation for the scientific attitude as part of the culture. We should clarify that the main methodological principle of science is not justified in holding a true statement unless you can support it by evidence or reason. It is not enough to be convinced of the truth inside one's beliefs. Must at some point, be objectively verifiable by impartial investigators. A belief is it is not guaranteed because it is "subjectively true", as Kierkegaard thought, if true it is because it has been confirmed by a research community. Legitimately believe that something is true is to relate one's beliefs to rational justification, is to make a statement about the world, regardless of one's desires.

Although the specific criteria to prove a belief depend on the subject under consideration, there are certain general criteria. We need to examine the evidence. Here I am referring to the observation data that are reproducible by independent observers and can be tested experimentally in test cases. This is called familiarly empirical or experimental approach. A belief is true if and only if, it has been confirmed, directly or indirectly, by reference to observable evidence. A belief is also validated by offering reasons to support it. Here are a logical considerations that are relevant.

A belief is invalid if it contradicts other beliefs very well supported within a structure. We also estimated our beliefs in part by its consequences observed in practice because of its effect on behavior. This is the utilitarian or pragmatic approach: the usefulness of a belief is judged by reference to its function and value. However, one can not claim that a belief is true simply because it has utility, the independent evidence and rational considerations are essential. However, the reference to the results of a belief, particularly those of a normative belief is important.

These general criteria are, of course, familiar in logic and philosophy of science. I'm talking about the hypothetical-deductive method of testing hypotheses. But this method should not be built closely, because the scientific method uses common sense is no esoteric art available only to initiates. Science uses the same methods of critical intelligence that the ordinary man uses to formulate beliefs about their physical world and is the method that must be used, to some extent, if you will live and work, make plans and choices. Deviate from the objective thinking is out of touch with reality cognitive, and we can not avoid using it if we are to handle the specific problems found in the world.

The paradox is that many people want to leave her practical intelligence when they enter the fields of religion or ethics or throw caution to the wind when you flirt with the so-called transcendental matters.

In any case there is a need to develop a general scientific attitude for all or most areas of life, using as much as possible, our critical intelligence evaluate beliefs, and insist they are based on clear grounds. The main corollary of this is the approach where we do not have enough evidence, we should suspend the trial. Our beliefs should be considered tentative hypotheses based on degrees of probability. Should not be considered absolute or final. We must be committed to the principle of fallibilism, which believes that our beliefs can be wrong. We must be willing to revise them, if need be in the light of new evidence and new theories.

scientific attitude so do not prejudge a priori grounds the examination of claims about the transcendent. Is committed to research free and open. You can not refuse to engage in research, for example of paranormal phenomena. But do not hold the right to ask that such research can be conducted responsibly and carefully, the evidence is not undone by the conjecture, and conclusions based on the will to believe.

The basic question is: How can we cultivate the scientific attitude? The most vital institution in society to develop an appreciation for the scientific attitude is the school. It is not enough, however, for schools simply to inform young people of the facts and disseminate a body of knowledge. The education of such kind can be nothing more que aprendizaje rutinario o adoctrinación. Más bien, un propósito principal de la educación deberá ser desarrollar dentro de los individuos el uso de la inteligencia crítica y el escepticismo. No es suficiente hacer que los estudiantes memoricen una materia, amasen hechos, pasen exámenes o aún dominen una especialidad o profesión o sean entrenados como ciudadanos. Si hacemos eso y nada más, no hemos educado completamente; la teoría central es cultivar la habilidad de verificar experiencias, evaluar las hipótesis, evaluar los argumentos -en resumen- desarrollar una actitud de objetividad e imparcialidad. La tremenda explosión informativa de hoy nos ha bombardeado compiten con afirmaciones verdaderas. Es vital que individuals to develop some understanding of effective criteria for judging these claims. I refer not only to our ability to examine claims of knowledge about the world but also our ability to develop certain characteristics in assessing value judgments and ethical principles. The goal of education should be to develop thoughtful people, skeptical but receptive to new ideas, always willing to consider further deviations of thought, while insisting that they are tested before being accepted.

education is not performed when transmitting a finite field or discipline students: only when we stimulate an active search process. This meta es apreciada actualmente en algunas instituciones educativas que intentan cultivar la inteligencia reflexiva. Pero la educación no está completa a menos que podamos extender nuestro interés a otras instituciones educativas de la sociedad. Si vamos a cultivar el nivel de la inteligencia crítica y promover la actitud científica, es importante que nos interesemos con los medios de comunicación masiva. Un problema especialmente serio con los medios electrónicos es que emplean las imágenes visuales más que los símbolos escritos, diseminan impresiones inmediatas en vez de análisis sustentados. ¿Cómo podemos estimular la crítica reflexiva en el público dando este tipo de información?

No tengo an easy solution to offer. What I want to suggest is that we should not assume, simply because ours is a scientific and advanced technological society that irrational thinking will be defeated. The evidence suggests that this is far from the case. Certainly, there is always the danger that science itself can be absorbed by the forces of unreason.

If we are to manage the problem, what we need, at least, is to be clear about the nature of the scientific enterprise itself and recognize that it presupposes a basic attitude about the obvious criteria. Unless we can teach through educational institutions of society make sense of the skeptical approach to life, and therapeutic and corrective-then I am afraid we are constantly confronted by new forms of know-nadismo. "

If we are to progress to overcome the irrationality, however, we must go further. Perhaps we should try to meet the need for mystery and drama and longing for meaning. The development of education and science in the modern world is a marvel to hold, and we should do anything to promote their development. But we have learned that an increase in the sum of knowledge by itself does not necessarily knock the superstition, dogma, and guilt, because they are nourished by other sources in the human psyche.

A point often overlooked in meeting our fascination with the mystery and drama is the possible role of imagination in science. Science can only proceed by being open to creative exploration of thought. The complete breaks in science are staggering, and will continue as long as we search beyond the microworld of matter and life and the universe in general. The space age is the beginning of a new era for humanity, just as we leave our solar system and explore the universe to search for extraterrestrial life. We need to spread an appreciation for the adventure of the scientific enterprise. Unfortunately, for some, science fiction is a substitute for science. The religion of the future can be a religion of the space age in which new prophets are not scientists, but the writers of science fiction.

Science has therefore a dual focus: objectivity and creativity. The arts are essential to keep alive the dramatic qualities of experience, poetry, music, literature and express our passionate nature. Man does not live by reason alone, and science is often viewed by critics as cold and rational. People crave something else. Our aesthetic impulses and our delight in the beauty need to be cultivated. The arts are the deepest expression of our spiritual interests, but we need to distinguish between art and truth.

In any case, we need to satisfy the search for meaning. It is this longing for the ethereal meaning, I think, leads to psychotic confusion found in cults of unreason. "Follow me," say the cult of irrationality. "I am the light, truth, and the road." And people are willing to abandon all critical thinking patterns in the process.

I wish to clarify that there is a need now to develop alternative regulatory institutions. Suggest that this program does not build systems that are patently false beliefs or irrational or violates the evidence of science; however, seek to address other dimensions of human experience, and give the arts, philosophy and ethics powerful roles to help meet human needs.

Note:
[1] Paul Kurtz is professor emeritus of philosophy at the State University of New York at Buffalo, is the founder of the Council for Secular Humanism and editor in chief of Free Inquiry magazine skeptical. Kurtz has written several books including "Defending the Reason" Tests of secular humanism and skepticism, Living Without religion - Eupraxophy, The new skepticism, Skeptical Odysseys, The fruit phohibido - the ethics of humanism. Taken

Kurtz, Paul: Defending Reason: Tests for Secular Humanism and Skepticism. Lima: AERPFA, 2002. Translated by MA Paz y Miño same author's article "The Scientific Attitude versus Antiscience and Pseudoscience" letter based on speech at the founding congress of the Committee on the scientific investigation of claims of the paranormal [CSICOP], published in English in The Humanist, July-August 1976, appeared later in Kurtz, Paul: In Defense of Secular Humanism. Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1983.

Sindioses.org